Oct 29 2009

Have Fun and Profit with Five Card Draw Poker

Category: Texas Holdem FAQmalcolm @ 10:16 am

Have you ever seen the film “Maverick” with Mel Gibson and Jodie Foster? If not you should because it is a good film all about Draw Poker. It features Gibson playing Brett Maverick who is a Five Card Draw poker player who thinks he is the best in the world. Five Card Draw is easy to learn and low limit players can play at decent limits because there are only two betting rounds. On my Internet surfing travels I found a free video to watch on the game which showed a proficient player for 29 minutes discussing his hands. I was hooked immediately.

Something about the game seems to work for me. As I have mentioned in previous articles you should try as many of the variations of poker as you can because one persons trash is another persons treasure so just because everyone plays Texas Hold’em does not mean it is your best game, or your most profitable.

Each player is dealt five live cards after the posting of the small blind and big blinds, just like Holdem. You place your bets in the first betting round. After the first betting round each player, from the player to the left of the dealer button onwards, can choose to draw one to five of their cards and have them replaced. They do not have to draw a card they can “stand-pat” and keep all of their cards. This usually signifies a strong hand. Players can of course fold before they bet; you are not forced to draw. There is one final betting round after the draw and if required the showdown then takes place. The best poker hand wins, with the hand strengths the same as Texas Hold’em. The winner takes the pot!

The game is slightly more simple to learn that Holdem because it only contains two betting rounds. In relation to strategy you should not be entering hands with less than a high pair as this is usually the best hand that is not beaten at showdown. Ideally you want something better than top pair before showdown. Because there are only two betting rounds your key choice in the game is whether to play the pot limit or no limit versions. Swings are smaller because of the two rounds of betting, but getting your money in good is where the money comes from in this game. If you are good at picking your spots then this is where money can be made. Pot Limit Draw is probably best played by either beginners looking to learn and not suffer big swings or professionals who have a sustained edge over their competition. Both games have their merit and it depends on your own personal preference which version of Draw you choose.

Some players do not like the game because money tends to go in with any hand bigger than a straight. If Player A, for example, holds a straight whilst Player B holds a flush, there are no community cards to scare you away from putting your chips in and thus a strong hand versus strong hand is always going to be all-in. Because there are only six players at a table (so everyone can draw cards out of the deck) the blinds come around quickly so your money would always have to go into the middle at this point. You are forced to call with good hands, but this lends itself to opportunities to profit as even good players must call when they would fold in other games.

The excellent part of Five Card Draw Poker is that it is quite similar to Hold’em in the way hand strength is played out and also when you are ahead you will generally be well ahead as you are not sharing your cards via the community cards. A player capable of watching their opponents closely, as there is lots of showdowns and information is more easily obtained on players, makes the observant player the best rewarded.

Bluffing must be well timed and based on player information, so the only way you can learn is to focus on your opponents and learn their tendencies. You cannot overdo bluffing as you will be called with many hands, but big calls on the river are less profitable because generally you either have a decent hand or you do not and new players migrating from Hold’em may not realise this. Online poker sites have a growing number of Draw games on their poker rooms so look out for better cash games popping up. I think this may turn out to be a really popular game in the future.

By Malcolm Clarke

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Tags: , , ,


Oct 20 2009

Poker Question and Answer Session

Category: Texas Holdem FAQmalcolm @ 3:49 pm

I often get emails through my website asking me about various poker issues and I thought I would post a few of the best with my answers on this blog. The first question is from a friend of mine.

Q1, All of my friends play Poker and they have around $200 per month to put into the game. I cannot afford a bankroll but really want to start playing. How do I get a stake? Rob, UK

Rob, just because your friends have $200 to play does not mean they are winning players. By you saying they “have around $200 per month” suggests to me most of the time they are losing this money. Many players start with no bankroll. Fortunately this does not stop them nor should it stop you playing poker seriously. Most reputable poker rooms have freeroll tournaments that offer a few dollars (up to $15 for the winner in some cases) in real money. There is nothing stopping you building up your bankroll from nothing. You will learn good bankroll management discipline, low stakes game theory and you will not have to worry about losing your hard earned money. Poker is one of the few things on the Internet that you can legitimately turn very little, even nothing, into a lot more. I am doing my own “Create a bankroll from nothing” challenge and am currently $13.85 up from $0.00. It does not sound like a lot but it is one of the most fulfilling things you can do with online poker. See you at the tables!

Q2, I am a winning online poker player and I want to turn professional. When is the right time? Peter via Email

Peter, you need to analyse your stats and decide if this is the life you want. The key difference between your poker play now and your poker play as a professional is that you are playing because you want to now and can stop when you want. When you must play everyday even when you do not want to this can be hard. Everyone dreams of being a professional, but only you know whether you can handle the variance, the freedom and the isolation of being a poker player. It is a lonely game, especially when you have played for hours and hours. That said there is the opportunity for big money to be made and many professionals do very well. My advice would be to enjoy the big money wins for six months before you make any snap decisions and that way you have money behind you if things do not go right. Do not gamble with your future, but there is no reason why poker cannot be a big part of it if you are good enough. Only you, and your stats, can give you the answer as to whether you are good enough.

Q3, Can you make a living just from Tournaments? Or will I Need to Learn Cash Games too? Anon

Cash games are, in my opinion, essential to your poker success. You need to be able to fire up multiple tables and grind out the profits. Even though people say to have one hundred plus buy-ins to profit at tournaments the swings really are a killer. Big money can be made in tournaments but even the professionals who win millions can throw in $250,000 in buy-ins and still not get a big win. Cash games allow a slow and steady accumulation of money providing you are a winning player. If I have a great week where I win, for example, $1500 I may enter a couple of large tournaments with 15 – 20% of that profit to shoot for the big score. Cash game wins along with VIP rewards or rakeback can be treated like a wage and is far more reliable than tournament wins. Tournament wins, however, can be a great bankroll booster so they do have their worth. Try and satellite in to bigger events to gain maximum value for your buy-ins. If you play only medium stakes cash games you can do very well. I have a friend who makes between $40,000 and $60,000 each year playing no higher than $2 – $4 No Limit Holdem and lives a comfortable life funded by poker.

Look out for more Question and answer posts very soon.

By Malcolm Clarke

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Tags: , , ,


Sep 29 2008

All In After the Flop

Category: Texas Holdem FAQCardRoom @ 3:44 am

I was into something that was really disturbing.

The other night, I played with my friends. There was player A, B, and so on and so forth. Player A went all in and I called the all in as player B. Then next was player C who raised and player D called.

Later on, I tried to check but some did told me that I have to call or fold player C because of having some chips. I was hesitant to do any of the two for I only wanted to compete for the all in and not the side pot actually.

If you were on my shoes that time, what will you do?

Gian

Gian,

Since player C had more chips than you, you had to either call their raise, or fold. The side pot is still part of the original hand. You cannot only compete for the main pot.

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Tags: , , , ,


Sep 29 2008

Comparing Full House

Category: Texas Holdem FAQCardRoom @ 3:38 am

Hi,

Well, my question is about comparing full houses. I remembered you once said or advised “Jacks full of tens (JJJ, TT) beats Jacks full of nines (JJJ, 99)”. I can’t remember when exactly you have said that. But I’m wondering, can that really ever happen? I believe that in a 52 card deck, there are only four jacks. Am I missing something?

Thanks you,
Jayden

Jayden,

In flop games, such as Texas Holdem or Omaha, there are situations that two players can have similar full houses due to shared cards. For example if you held pocket tens and your opponent held pocket nines, three jacks on the flop would give you both jacks full. The same is true if you held J-10 and your opponent held J-9 and the board ran out J-J-10-9-4. In games other than Holdem and Omaha, it is not possible for two players to have jacks full unless they are playing with wild cards.

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Tags: , , ,


Sep 29 2008

Betting Issue

Category: Texas Holdem FAQCardRoom @ 3:36 am

The other night, there was a particular incident that almost caused a terrible fight among players.

Well, as I could remember, there was a small blind which was 30 and 60 as the big blind. The first player to supposedly act had only 61 chips, therefore with 61, he went all in.

In your opinion, how many chips should the next player possess to act out? Well, at first instance I thought it should be 61, but eventually I became unsure. Most people at the room fought out it should be 120. At that point, I heard somebody saying that since the hand was actually raised, the minimum raise therefore should be 120 to those with adequate chips.

Any comment will be much appreciated. Thanks!

By the way, nice site.

Keith Johnson

Keith,
In the situation above, the next player only has to call 61. If they want to raise, the minimum raise is to 121. The players raise to 61 is not considered a full raise since it was less than half the minimum.

If this was limit holdem, this changes. Since the all-in raise was less than half of a bet, the players can only complete the initial raise and make it 120.

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Tags: , ,


Sep 29 2008

Not Having Enough to Cover Blinds

Category: Texas Holdem FAQCardRoom @ 3:31 am

For some time now, something has been bothering me. It has actually something to do with what happened to me at a regular game where in the big blind haven’t had enough to cover the blinds.

Let us just put this way, the blinds were at 75/150 and the big blind only has 50. I’m wondering, do you think he is entitled to win the blinds though he doesn’t have enough? Or rather, he can just win the amount he had since the beginning?

Personally, I believe he should only win the amount he had in the first place. But I’m not so sure about this. Any advice for me?

Thank you.

Roan

Roan,

The big blind could only win up to the amount he has in front of him. The player in the small blind would get back 25 and they would play for the 100 chip pot. At no time can a player win more from a single player than they have in front of them.

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Tags: , ,


Sep 29 2008

Minimum Raise on Betting Rounds

Category: Texas Holdem FAQCardRoom @ 3:24 am

Hello,

I hope you don’t mind if I ask something about betting.

Let’s say for an instance, in a no limit game, the blinds are 50/100. Then there is player 1 who is the first one to act after the big blinds and a raise to 300, players 2 and 3 fold to player 4 who eventually places a 500 chip.

Player 1, being dissatisfied discoursed that a re-raise less than double the original bet is not possible. Any idea?

Somehow, I thought that a re-raise was only bound to the minimum of the big blind, therefore if someone places a bet of 300, I could make it 350 or so. Do you think, the minimum raise should be twice larger than the bet placed earlier? And one more thing, is this the same thing at all betting rounds?

Thanks!
Jacob

Jacob,

Once a pot has been raised, the re-raise must be in the amount of the previous raise. In your example above, since your opponent raised by 200, the reraise must be at least 200. Player four’s bet off 500 was a call of 300 and a 200 raise.

This applies to all streets of betting.

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Tags: , , ,


Sep 29 2008

Check and Raise in Holdem

Category: Texas Holdem FAQCardRoom @ 3:20 am

I’m just a starting poker player and as of now I’m not yet so sure about some stuff particularly about check and raise in the same round of betting in regular poker. I know it’s not possible to check and raise in the same round of betting in regular games, but how about in Holdem?

Thanks!
Clark

Clark,

A check-raise is not only a common occurrence in Holdem, it is an encouraged tool for players to develop. When you are trying to extract money from an overly aggressive player, then checking to this player to induce a bet can be the proper play. You can then raise them to force more money into the pot or maybe even force them to fold if they were bluffing.

Also, whoever told you that you cannot check-raise during other forms of poker was mistaken. While it used to be frowned upon to do a check-raise and even banned in some casinos, the practice is now considered a standard part of playing poker.

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Tags: , , ,


Sep 29 2008

Was it a Check Raise?

Category: Texas Holdem FAQCardRoom @ 3:15 am

Up to this time while writing this, I’m still bothered about a certain situation that came up in one of our home games.

Well, three players were left in the pot and at the turn the 1st player to act bet. Eventually, the 2nd player to act called and then the 3rd player raised. After which, the 1st player called and the 2nd player re-raised. Someone at the table who was not in the hand called a foul for he thought a re-raise after a call was not supposedly possible.

Personally, I thought it was a check raise so I haven’t reacted.

What do you think?

Regards,
Jayden

Jayden,

A check-raise is when a player checks the betting to another opponent, that opponent bet and then you raise. What your opponent did was known as a limp-raise. This is perfectly acceptable. When a player raises as opposed to calling a bet, they are reopening the action to other players. The players have the same options to call, raise, or fold. Would your opponent objected to your other opponent calling and then folding to a raise? Not likely.

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Tags: , , , , ,


Sep 29 2008

On Poker Rules

Category: Texas Holdem FAQCardRoom @ 3:02 am

Hello,
I’ve got here a few questions. Hope you could find some time to answer them. Thanks in advance.

  1. For an instance, the blinds are 500 and 1,000 but the person who is supposed to be the big blind has only about 800 to post and a number of players are still on board. I don’t know whether or not these players have to post 1,000 in order to stay in or otherwise just match the 800 of the big blind.
  2. In what specific situations do you think there are no small or big blinds? I’m not so sure, but I think you already shared something about such before.
  3. For example there is a King high straight on the board and it’s the best hand. However, in the later part, it turned out that one of the players also holds a King in his pocket hand. What do you think, does the King that first occurred on the board overrule the King in pocket hand? Or else, the player could claim the hand?
  4. For an instance the blinds are 100 and 200, then after the flop, a certain player raises to 400. I’m wondering if the player to the left of the one who raises wants to raise, does he need to raise to 800 or just double the big blind otherwise? Any idea about this?

Thanks,
Francis

Francis,

  1. The players need to call the full 1,000 blind amount.
  2. The only possible way there would not be a blind would be a case that both opponent were all-in for the ante. There are instances in a tournament where a small blind is eliminated the hand prior to their turn to post. In that case there would not be a small blind.
  3. The player king in his hand is irrelevant. The object of Holdem is to make the best five card hand. Since the best five card hand is on board, everyone still in the pot splits the pot.
  4. A reraise must be in the amount of the prior raise. In this case, they must raise to 800.
VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Tags: , , , ,


« Previous PageNext Page »