Mar 10 2010

Beating Double or Nothing SNG Tournaments in 2010

Category: Poker Blogmalcolm @ 3:40 pm

Poker theory changes so fast you can never be sure that you are reading current theory. A poker book that was written in 2006 may have some good information in 2010, but alas not enough. This article will be good for anyone wanting to play Double or Nothing Sit and go poker tournaments in 2010, but possibly not if you come across it in 2013. Nevertheless, these general concepts will remain the same and you should be aware of them.

You will find DON poker tournaments in most online poker rooms. They are a uniquely structured tournament where the top five finishers win and double their money (less the rake) and the bottom five finishers, as the Weakest Link host Anne Robinson says, ‘they leave with nothing’. You must be able to cash in around 65% of these tournaments to show a good win rate over time and they are only profitable when multi-tabling as you must reduce the amount of time it takes to run out this marginal profit. This is why some players leave them alone, but others enjoy the low-risk nature of them and they are very beatable.

Grinder Alert!

Other poker players will be grinding these tournaments. You can spot who these may be in a number of ways. Grinders will fold around 95% or more of their hands in the opening two levels of play. It is easy therefore to make a note of the players who literally fold everything. After the opening two rounds you should be able to spot these players easily. A tool like Sharkscope is useful also, but bear in mind that in 2010 this tool must be opt-in and players can choose not to, therefore masking their profits and their ability.

Early Stages – First Two Levels

Watch out for the grinders and make a note. These are the players you will need to avoid later on as they play their hands optimally in this structure. You need to play like them and fold most of your hands. The key to the early stages is taking no risks to accumulate chips which are not worth the actual gains in tournament equity (ICM).

The early levels are about survival, but if you get a premium hand then play it strongly. If a couple of players are eliminated here then things are looking good for you.

Middle Stages – Third and Fourth Level

When the ante appears we have more reason to steal the blinds. Think position because this is important and you should still be relatively tight, although loosening off as the blinds get higher in relation to your stack. Rarely call raises unless you are holding AA or KK. Even AK is easily beaten and whether or not I play AK depends on your opponents previous hands.

If you play a hand you should be first into the pot when it is folded to you in position.

Endgame – Above 100/200

Hopefully we are down to six or seven players now. Almost immediately bubble play takes over. I have read many articles on DON strategy and they all advocate never calling all-in. All-in is a powerful way to maintain a stack but you need to be first into the pot to make this move. I would call all-in with AA, KK or QQ if I am honest, but others advocate an even tighter approach. With blinds high and plenty of folding and all-ins, it is only a matter of time before a confrontation that could end the tournament occurs.

The ability to quickly adjust throughout the tournaments is important to DON SNG success. Bubble play is also critical and if you are a good SNG player already with a good knowledge and appreciation of ICM (Independent Chip Modelling) theory then you are primed to do very well at these enjoyable poker tournaments.

By Malcolm Clarke

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Tags: , , , , , , , ,


Feb 24 2010

Why I Love Bankroll Challenges

Category: Poker Blogmalcolm @ 9:03 pm

Bankroll challenges are the best thing you can do to play poker. Why? They teach you about far more than playing your hands and equip you with skills that you can use in every poker session for the rest of the time you play the game. First though, a newsflash…

It is true that when you play Texas Hold’em poker online you can lose a lot of money. Alert the sceptics! But is that a reason to run away if you enjoy playing? Certainly not! Bankroll challenges keep you playing the right way, controlling the risk and that (along with great skills) is part of playing winning poker and if you are prone to playing too high for your bankroll, then learning bankroll management is more important than squeezing out an extra 1 BB/100 right now for you.

My own bankroll challenge saw me start with $20 and using good bankroll management, I had to slowly build from the lowest cash games and tournaments to a more substantial bankroll. This has many benefits for my poker game.

Starting with a small bankroll makes you very aware of your chances of going bust and gives you a heightened perception of the value of that small bankroll. I do not like to lose, so busting hurts as much (in terms of the challenge) as if I busted a larger bankroll. Also, if my playing skills need work I would rather discover that nursing a $20 hole in my bankroll than a $2000 hole. If you are a new player I see playing from a small bankroll as an Apprenticeship you should serve to prove to yourself that you are able to beat online poker.

Some would argue, and on the whole I agree, that because you can win money from playing freerolls then working up through the micro stakes to larger games you should play from a small bankroll and learn patience. Even if Poker rooms prevented players from making any deposits some players (very skilled players admittedly) would still rise from the bottom and become a fantastic player with a large bankroll. I see it as a personal challenge to become good enough at Poker to do that.

There is also the personal satisfaction of completing a bankroll challenge. Chris “Jesus” Ferguson turned $0 into $10,000 as a challenge. Imagine the feeling knowing you have successfully turned nothing into $10,000! In what other area of enterprise can you do that, where nothing really means absolutely no money! From an achievement point of view being good at poker can have personal success benefits as well as earning you money. Money is not everything in poker; success is felt and enjoyed beyond the financial benefits of a poker challenge.

Perhaps you would like to do a bankroll challenge. You should start with a small bankroll and set yourself specific bankroll targets before you move up. You should always have one hundred buy-ins for the level of tournament and around twenty buy-ins for cash games. I like to take shots at higher levels of cash game if I reach fifteen buy-ins for that level but I move down if things do not work out. Moving down when things are not going well and moving up when things are going well is how losses are minimised and profits maximised. Do not be afraid to stop moving up if you feel you are getting uncomfortable with the amount of money at risk in pots. Everyone has their comfort zone; I have a friend who makes over $40,000 each year playing at levels under $1/$2. The profits are always there if you are good enough!

Enjoy your poker challenge and let me know how you get on! I’’ll be working hard on my challenge in the meantime!

By Malcolm Clarke

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Tags: , , , , ,


Feb 20 2010

Tournament Structures Discussed

Category: Poker Blogmalcolm @ 3:18 pm

There are many different types of Poker Tournaments that you can participate in, particularly if you like to play poker online. Each different type of tournament with a different structure needs a different approach in order to succeed. We are going to look at each type of structure in turn and analyse what sort of approach is optimal in each one. Future articles will look at each type of poker tournament in more detail. Before you sign up to any poker tournament you should be analysing the structure and assessing if it is worth your while to play in it.

Freezeout Tournaments

These tournaments are the most frequently played. Players get one buy-in and pay-outs and prizes are decided by what your finishing position is. Once you bust out of the tournament your game is over i.e. once you lose, you are frozen out from continuing to play. The structure of a freezeout is normally now like a deepstack or a turbo, but somewhere in the middle. A solid grasp of poker tournament strategy gives you a good chance of success in this tournament format.

Re-buy Tournaments

For the first ninety minutes or opening levels of some poker tournaments you buy a new stack of chips if you are busted. For this reason players like to build a stack in the early part of the poker tournaments by gambling. This is a good strategy to use because as everyone else is gambling you get far more value spots where a raise can be far lighter in terms of hand strength than when a player would bust out if he is called.

Action in a re-buy period of a tournament is fast and furious and not for the weak at heart. They can give you a good opportunity for building a big stack for the later stages of the tournament but you will need to change gears and adopt a more conservative style of play after the re-buy period ends as players immediately tighten up. The action at the beginning is only such because players can re-buy if things do not work out for them.

Turbo Structures

Poker tournaments can often take around four hours to complete, sometimes a lot longer. Players who enjoy participating in online poker tournaments sometimes do not have as long to play before other engagements so they prefer a faster structure. Not only does the faster structure get the poker tournament completed in a shorter space of time but the strategies used are more straight-forward. This gives less skilled players a better chance to win. Players are looking to get their money in as the favourite and hope to hold. Winning these marginal situations are a big part of getting lucky enough to win the tournament, rather than relying on squeeze plays and other complicated moves to outplay their opponents. A player with a skill edge also enjoys tournaments as their profit is obtained in a shorter space of time.

Different types of poker tournaments suit different types of player. If you enjoy a gamble rather than steadily outplaying your opponents then you will find the poker tournament structures that suit you best are the ones with the faster structures. The poker strategy required to beat those games is better suited to your own poker playing preferences. Try out all the different types of tournaments and see which suits you best.

Just because you think one will suit you does not mean it will unless you have already experienced it. Keep accurate records and let the statistics show you which type of poker tournament to focus on. Prize pools are always healthy, so do not delay in finding your best game.

By Malcolm Clarke

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Tags: , , ,


Feb 16 2010

DVD Poker Tuition Discussed

Category: Poker Blogmalcolm @ 11:12 am

There are many DVD’s on the market to help teach you how to play poker. Most were recorded a few years ago at the height of the poker boom with players racing to release products to capitalise on the sudden interest in the game and glut of new players entering the poker market. This compromised the quality of what was on offer due to the speed the products were released and with the game developing this article asks whether any of the DVD training materials in the marketplace are value for money. In my research I have found that unfortunately this does not appear to be the case, but there is another solution.

Phil Hellmuth, Mike Caro, Howard Lederer, Phil Gordon and many others released DVD products to satisfy demand in people wanting to know how to play poker. These types of things are often cleverly placed in Supermarkets and stores and regularly get picked up by well-meaning family members as stocking fillers at Christmas. You even have had one in the last few years, I know I have!

Before you buy these DVD products to help a family member or friend learn Texas Holdem remember that these products are for the absolute novice. If the person who will watch the poker tuition DVD is already playing online poker and winning then the material in the training will not be advanced enough for them and they will gain little from being told what a raise is and what a check is when they already know the basics. Once you have watched these DVD’s you should have a good grounding of how to play and this is also important.

Because online poker has become a game played primarily by intermediate and advanced players with the odd fish here and there these DVD’s are too basic for the standard online poker player. Whilst you may well enjoy watching the poker players go through the basic concepts in poker, perhaps marvelling at how slim and young they look, you will need to look elsewhere to take your online poker game to the next level. Note that there are few DVD’s available that have been released after 2006. So where are the players going for that all important poker training?

The answer is online poker training websites. For a monthly subscription of around $20 – $40 players can stream tuition videos made by the best online poker players. The advantages over this type of training are that the players selected to make the videos by the training sites are selected for two reasons. Firstly, their ability to put into words the strategies they use for their success and second, their poker resume online is very good and they are therefore worth listening to and learning from. Most of the players selling the DVD’s are well-known, but not for online poker play. Whilst you may not buy a DVD with Adam Junglen on the front of it you would benefit greatly from what this great player has to say on beating online poker because he does it everyday.

If you get a Poker DVD for a birthday or Christmas present then do not despair. Perhaps you should have dropped better hints for a subscription to Card Runners or Deuces Cracked! Fortunately the price of these products are low enough where you can watch it once and take whatever value you can get from the advice (they are not all terrible) and move on. Certainly there are more advanced lessons on three betting, continuation bets and check raising that are generally not covered by the DVD tuition on the online poker training websites and that is where you should go for modern poker training.

By Malcolm Clarke

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Tags: , , ,


Jan 29 2010

Should Poker Rooms Sponsor Players?

Category: Poker Blogmalcolm @ 9:51 am

The marketing side of poker is big business with the top players paid to wear branded logos for poker rooms. At tournaments like the World Series of Poker, representatives for the biggest poker rooms offer large sums for players to wear their badges. It was reported that Darvin Moon, the second place finisher in the 2009 WSOP main event, declined all offers for sponsorship and was apparently offered $500,000 by a poker room in a last ditch attempt to have him wear their brand for the live final table. Amazingly, Darvin declined the offer.

Are these types of sponsorships worth it? Many poker sites send players to large events and stipulate the players wear their branded T shirt and caps as part of the deal. They hope the players get on television but this may not happen and they may bust out early in the tournament. The site hopes that the player wins their seat through their site and goes on to earn a big score from the event. Other players then follow suit hoping for a similar outcome. Chris Moneymaker won his seat to the 2003 World Series of Poker through winning a series of satellites into the event. His total investment was said to be $40 to win $2.5 million. Pokerstars did very well in subsequent years sending hundreds of players to the event.

Competition is high for the poker rooms and many rooms sign up players to long term deals. Annette Obrestad works with Betfair who pays her buy-ins to large tournaments all around the world. You question whether this is value for money. Annette does get a lot of exposure but it is she that gets the exposure not the site she represents. Of course their badge is on display if she gets on television, but there is no verbal discussion of Betfair when the TV watches Annette. The site hopes people notice the badge, like Annette’s play, and visits the site she recommends by the logo she is wearing.

The problem for the poker rooms is that every site sponsors players and it is costing a lot of money to keep up. There is a trend towards sites rewarding their high raking regular players with live sponsorship deals to go to live events, thus holding onto their custom. It also shows other players that increasing their play with the site could be very beneficial to them.

James Akenhead signed up as a Full Tilt Red Pro after making the final table of the World Series of Poker and went on to play in the World Series of Poker Europe Main Event and win the Poker Million. He appeared in many magazines and interviews as a result of his achievements in 2009. In every picture or TV segment he was wearing the badge of Full Tilt. Whatever they paid/pay James for him to wear their logos paid off. There are, however, many Red Pros who are staked into events and earning great rakeback that you wonder whether they are value for that investment.

Poker rooms also run the risk that the player may get into trouble. If an incident occurs like Scotty Nguyen in the 2008 HORSE event at the WSOP then the poker rooms would not enjoy being associated with it. The motivation of the players for sponsorship is also a worry for the sites. Many of them are just looking for a way to be a poker professional, live comfortably and play in large events. A proportion of them will care about the site and how they represent it, but most would sign up with whoever offered them the deal. Darvin Moon should be praised for his refusal to sign up as a sponsored player. Why? Because he said he never played online poker and to wear a badge would mislead the public who did not know he was a live only player.

A great way to represent a poker room is to win a satellite and be sent to a large poker event. Bwin sent many players to the Aussie Millions and their players are genuinely representing the site and their progress can be followed by reading the bwin poker blog.

By Malcolm Clarke

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 8.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Tags: , , , , , ,


Jan 18 2010

Freshen Up Poker with a Change

Category: Poker Blogmalcolm @ 12:26 pm

If you are a regular online poker player you can often feel like the game gets very repetitive. You may sit every day on the online poker tables and watch the same poker software playing against the same players and the grind can seem very grinding indeed. Perhaps you need a change either focusing on poker tournaments instead of cash games or vice versa. Avoiding burn out and looking for the signs of burn out are important to becoming and remaining a winning poker player.

Running multiple cash game tables removes the feeling of being involved on every table. Feeling a part of the cash game keeps you interested but if you are moving to and from different tables quickly then you feel like you are almost above the action and only a small part of it. This can resonate into a player becoming bored very quickly, which can compound any losses and make players leave a session early.

You could change your poker room and try a new site to keep things feeling fresh. Something as simple as looking at a different table style on a different poker room with different usernames playing poker can cause you to instantly perk up and feel more enthusiastic about playing poker. Do you ever get bored of seeing the same view from your office window? Although the feeling of buoyancy if you moved positions in the office is temporary, the feelings are real and you can harness these positive feelings by enforcing change in your poker routine.

Shaun Deeb, the online poker tournament phenom who played around thirty poker tournaments per day on multiple tables is currently on a break from tournaments after admitting to be completely burned out by them. Playing thirty tables per day I am surprised he was not burned out sooner, yet it shows even the best players recognise the need to change or take a break. He will probably come back a more dangerous player and enjoy renewed sustained success as a result of this self imposed vacation.

The right time to make a change is when things are not going well for you. The best time to make a change is just before the run of bad poker which comes about either through luck or self-inflicted bad play. Recognise the signs that you are becoming fidgety or on edge with the poker room or games before it turns into losses.

Remember, however, that grinding online poker is not easy and you must endure it to some extent exactly like a person working a full time job needs to do. You should enjoy playing poker but sometimes you will want to do something else and this is the point where you must be professional and grind it out. The research you have done on fellow players and hand histories you have worked on are lost if you change sites so some degree of pain is tolerable in the poker grind. If you work a normal job then you will probably regularly feel this way but stick it out and keep trying hard to win.

Playing on a new poker room will reignite your interest in poker as every room as different poker tournaments to participate in with slightly different structures, prize pools and bonuses. Try bwin.com which is backed up by the large sports betting company. Aesthetically the dark style of poker software and table layouts they use will be enough to make you feel fresh even when you play a lot of online poker.

By Malcolm Clarke

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 8.0/10 (2 votes cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Tags: , , , ,


Jan 08 2010

Review of Collin Moshmans SNG Book

Category: Poker Blogmalcolm @ 6:02 pm

Two plus Two publishing have released many good poker books over the years and a semi recent release was to help the various Sit and go poker tournament specialists improve their one table poker tournament performances. The two plus two poker books are always presented with carefully chosen paragraphs and explained in a way that helps both the experienced and the amateur player learn what the book is intended to teach them. They are a personal favourite publisher of my growing poker library and thankfully this book matches the high standard set by their other poker books.

The book is titled Sit ‘n Go Strategy Expert Advice for beating one-table poker tournaments. It is divided into four specific sections allowing the reader, if they wish, to go straight to the section they wish to study. Those sections are low blind play, mid blind play, high blind play and career play. As the majority of poker articles relating to sit and go play are split up in this way the book does not try to re-invent the wheel when teaching players their version of online poker strategy for SNG’s which is a plus point of the publication in my opinion.

Splitting the play into sections helps understand how to win sit and go poker tournaments. The blinds play a major part of the game and the book rightly acknowledges this. You are given essential concepts for pre-flop and post flop in each section with lots of hand examples with each discussion discussed. They split the types of hands you can hold into various categories making it easy for you to classify your hand. You may have a monster, strong draw, hands where you were the pre-flop aggressor or marginal hands.

Most of the hand examples are excellent however one small criticism I have (I am hard to please!) is that sometimes when the hand is getting very tricky and a tough decision would be made on the turn they allow the example to have you hit your improvement card. It would be good for more tough spots to be discussed but the examples do clearly explain their concepts discussed in the theory text.

The sections on mid and high level blind play are excellent. They are substantial and you will find yourself studying the book over and over learning the concepts. This is definitely not a book where you will read through once and think “I know everything”. There is much to learn and it will take time. The good news is from what I can see nothing is missed out and a wannabe SNG star will love this book and constantly refer to it as a reference. It is almost a SNG bible.

Perhaps a small disappointment for readers looking to turn sit and go grinding into a semi-professional form of income is the section on career play. Whilst the title of the chapter is career play the discussion moves to discussing hand reading skills and whether or not you should show hands. This is more a discussion at general poker strategy that applies whether you want to make SNG poker a career or not. Discussing multi-tabling is also relevant to everyone and it is ever so slightly misleading to put this information in this chapter.

After a shaky start in that section they discuss poker software and what to use in terms of VPIP and so on which is good advice. They also discuss bankroll management and the need to be more cautious if poker is your main income stream. Variance is discussed in detail and after you read this section you are left with a clear understanding that poker involves luck and how even a good player has to be careful with their bankrolls to keep their head above water when the downswings occur. For someone who was not aware of these concepts it is vital reading and therefore it is excellent that information like this is included in the book.

Overall I think this is an excellent book. Of course no-one can guarantee you will win money but after reading the book you will hold more tools to help you win sit and go’s. I am happy to highly recommend this poker book to anyone interested in one table poker tournaments.

By Malcolm Clarke

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Tags: , , , , ,


Jan 06 2010

The Flourishing Relationship Between Poker and Web 2.0

Category: Poker Blogmalcolm @ 11:04 am

Online poker is changing and developing just like the rest of the Internet. In 2001 my cousin and I had an idea that we thought might catch on. We thought that music bands would benefit from having a space on the Internet where they can share their music. My cousin and I were right. Today they have myspace because of the “Web 2.0″ capabilities which due to the development of broadband gives users more things to do online. Video, audio and social networking and interaction with other cyber users are available to all and Facebook, Twitter and other interactive services are becoming the future of the Internet.

Millions of poker players are registered in various poker rooms and play poker games nearly everyday. As the Internet develops it is only natural that the poker community follows suit and takes advantage of the new opportunities that web 2.0 offers.

Currently there are around five major poker training websites with more in development that are entering the market to help players improve their online poker game. They are Stox Poker, Card Runners, Deuces Cracked, PokerVT with Daniel Negreanu and many more. They offer training videos that are streamed via a media player on demand to the player seeking training. Depending on the coaches at each site who are mostly online poker professional players they specialise in SNG, Cash games, Short Handed poker or poker tournaments. Using content management systems they are able to quickly upload videos to help players learn to play better poker. For a subscription fee users have access to new videos getting uploaded by the poker coaches every week.

Web 2.0 new media can be blamed (or thanked) for the increase in the standard of Texas Hold ‘em online. Before the release of poker training websites players had to read books and independently study away from the poker table. Many players simply did not do this and improvements to their game took longer to achieve. Now players can learn in front of their computer and their learning experience is made fun by the use of video, Skype and the Internet. This has improved Texas Hold ‘em play across the Internet and made it important for players to start learning other games such as Omaha or Stud.

There was a social network launched recently that mimics Facebook in style and purpose specifically for poker players. Whilst poker is an individual game that involves each player trying to win all of the money these social networks which are perhaps unlikely to work considering the selfishness of poker, are flourishing in popularity and allowing players to share ideas and help each other improve. This mutual tuition is another reason why the advancement of the Internets functionality is improving the standard of play you encounter when playing online poker. Before VOIP, Skype and web cams players only had email to keep in touch.

As the normal Internet user can use more video and more ways of connecting with other users the standard of poker will continue to improve. The technology used by poker rooms in their poker software will also develop which should make for a more enjoyable experience of online poker. Pokers development is closely linked with progress made online and as sites like YouTube, Google and Microsoft improve their sites and services we feel a direct benefit when playing online poker.

I very much enjoy discussing poker via Skype with many people around the world most of whom I have never met! The development of the Internet in this way means social contact in person is becoming rare in the context of poker. We can now discuss hands via Skype, replay hands using hand history replayers and easily post them to forums for feedback from other poker players. All you need do is get involved and feel the benefits of using web 2.0 to begin to improve your online poker game.

By Malcolm Clarke

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 8.0/10 (2 votes cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Tags: , , , , , ,


Dec 19 2009

Playing Heads up Against Aggressive Stealers

Category: Poker Blogcarl @ 12:31 pm

In ring games whether they are full-ring or six max, there will always be a fair number of players who will raise with a fairly wide range from the button. Most of the time a wider opening range will be correct anyway but some players stray away from this in many poker games and start open raising with around 75% of their total range!

This may even be correct of course at the lower stakes games where more players are playing tightly and especially if they are getting rakeback. If you have been active in a game and have been folding several big blinds then whoever is on the button may just think that it is open season on your blind.

One such hand that I played last year should highlight the point. It was folded to the button who open raised to $3.50 in a NL100 Holdem poker game and we both had $100+ stacks. I had the Kc-3c and called. Many players would either three bet or fold here and these are not bad lines to take.

My own preference is not to escalate a pot out of position with a weak hand and to try and see more streets against a player who I rate to be better than. I want to outplay him and not try to outmuscle him. Trying to outmuscle someone who is prepared for a fight may not be a very wise online poker strategy and I have the capability to play well beyond the flop.

The flop came Ah-Ks-2d giving me middle pair and weak kicker. My opponent had been very aggressive and my Poker Office told me that this guy raised a lot of buttons when it had been folded to him. So my middle pair is now ahead of his range so I wait for the obvious continuation bet and check-call.

If I am behind then so be it and your variance increases in and around the blinds but you shouldn’t be afraid of that as good solid short handed skills can make you a mint in small-stakes poker. My opponent was raising 73% of his hands when folded to on the button so my K-3s favours well against his range.

Against players who play badly post flop and who think that aggression is the be all and end all of poker then you can really find good EV in these situations. The turn card is the 3h giving me two pair and the probable best hand. With $17.50 in the pot then I need to decide what to do. If I check then they may check a lot of hands back as I have called a pre-flop raise and also a flop bet on a board with no draws.

I decide to check and let him possibly fire another barrel as a bluff and I do so but this plan is foiled by them checking behind me. The river card is the 9d and now it is time to value bet or to encourage a bluff. His betting sequence looks weak so I make what looks like a weak stab and bet $10 and he raises to $35 and I call and take the pot.

Carl “The Dean” Sampson

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 8.0/10 (2 votes cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Tags: , , , ,


Dec 08 2009

Low Stakes Poker to Air Next Summer

Category: Poker Blogmalcolm @ 8:48 am

Fox Network has recorded a new Poker TV show which any poker player can take part in. They have enjoyed great success with their show “High Stakes Poker” where fans sit back in awe watching players willing to play at the highest stakes fight for pots worth sometimes over $500,000 of real money. The new show is going to be called “Low Stakes Poker” and Fox believes this will relate to every poker player as something they understand and could take part in.

It is a shrewd move by Fox who appreciate that the player pool at the top level of Texas Hold ‘em poker are a close knit group and the players style is governed on High Stakes Poker many times by previous history with the opponent. Playing at lower stakes the show will be more about standard play highlighting the flaws in the player’s games. Closing these leaks will help the participating players get better without costing a lot of money.

The action is $0.02/$0.04 meaning that an adequate bankroll for this game would be around fifty to one hundred dollars of real money if you follow the recommended guidelines of good bankroll management. Of course players will turn up to this poker show with their last ten dollars, that is the nature of good poker television.

Fox are keen to show that they do not share the blasé attitude that the top poker players have to large losses at the poker table on shows like Poker after Dark or High Stakes Poker. In the current economic climate they appreciate that times are tough and they want to encourage poker players that fun games can be found at any level of poker and you do not need to risk it all at the high stakes poker tables. If you only have $10 to play poker with there are still games to play and you should play hard just as if you had $10,000 at the table. This is a view shared by Kevin Reilly of Fox.

Kevin is quoted as saying that the decadence of poker players and their tolerance to large amounts of risk is not something they wish to promote too hard. They do go to incredible lengths to ensure comparisons with High Stakes Poker are obvious only in their difference to it. Play was recorded on an Air Hockey table in a public area and not in the closed and securely guarded room in the casino. Players had bundles of nickels rather than the thick wad of dollar bills used by the high stakes participants. This does not mean the players do not try in low stakes poker and the value of money is stressed at all times.

It is pleasing to see that the TV network appreciates that the value of money depends solely on the individual. Many lower stakes poker players would feel just as bad losing $10 as a high stakes player like Tom Dwan would feel losing $100,000. In Low Stakes Poker every player is fighting for the chips no matter what their value.

Rather than the pots being $180,000 they are more like $18, but hopefully people will still enjoy the entertainment. The players selected are likely to make up for the lack of large cash pots with superb entertainment and some slapstick humour. You can expect an inadvertent High Stakes Poker spoof show with serious poker being played as players realise the stakes are small and viewers do not tune in for the poker pots like they do on High Stakes Poker. For many of them this is their moment in the spotlight and they will ensure you are entertained thoroughly. Phil Hellmuth is taking part and this will ensure plenty of lively banter at the table.

I cannot wait for this show to air and only hope it is shown in the UK where I am based. This could be something very popular and something most players could participate in and aspire to be part of. Make sure you tune in to what could become a cult poker sites in 2010 and could see many players join in at the lower stakes games.

By Malcolm Clarke

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 6.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Tags: , , , , , ,


Next Page »