May 29 2010

Part 1 – How to Improve your Bluffing Ability

Category: Online poker tipsmalcolm @ 3:04 pm

My efforts to improve my Texas Holdem poker game never stop. I try to work on every part of my game and improve every area to hopefully make that big breakthrough to either crush the cash games or poker tournaments I play in. An important aspect of poker that is fun, but very difficult to do well, is bluffing. I have read many poker strategy articles and from my own experience these are some of the things to learn about in relation to bluffing.

Pick Spots Wisely

During a hand you may feel there is an opening to win the pot there and then. For example, during a Texas Hold ‘em hand your opponent may stop betting and after checking to you on the turn after the action went check-check on the flop you may consider betting with a weak hand. If your opponent is not a trappy player, you may win the hand at this point with a solid bet.

Note that in this case you have spotted an opportunity and made the bluff bet because of it. You have not simply bet randomly. Pick your spots wisely. Against a player that will usually showdown bottom pair, this is not the right time to make a pot sized bet with Ace high. Against a fish, bluffs have less value; the thing to do against fish is have a good hand because they will play with you. Bluff better players as a general rule, because they can fold!

Be Consistently Inconsistent

Deception is a massive part of poker. You want to make opponents as unsure as you possibly can over your motives when you bet, raise or check. Each action, in an ideal world, should be able to be interpreted in many different ways. Frankly this is all but impossible to do because you are either tight or loose generally, but try and be consistently different in how you play your hands in terms of strength. Bluffing on the flop, turn or river and betting when you have a good hand in a similar situation plants the seeds of doubt in the mind of your opponents. If they are uncertain and they have a marginal hand, it is very difficult to carry on in the hand.

Watch Tom Dwan play cash games, many of his opponents fold because they know he could be bluffing or betting a monster. He plays the same way whether strong or weak and this creates his deception. It is very effective and has made him millions of dollars.

Tell a Story

If the story developing through the hand does not fit your bluff it is likely to be called. In the following example this is explained more clearly.

You raise 3 x the big blind in late position holding 7c-7d as the first player into the hand and are called by one player in the blinds. The flop is, Kh-As-8s. The player bets half the pot and you call. The turn is a 2c. He bets half the pot and you raise as a bluff steal. This is not a good time to attempt a steal.

Why? He/she has shown action on two streets. There are overcards to your pocket pair and by betting your opponent has said “I am interested in this hand”. The turn card was a total blank given the action and yet your opponent still bet. You flat called on the flop and raise the turn. This does not appear consistent with the betting. A two could not have helped your hand. Unless your opponent thinks you are slowplaying a huge monster they must call you. Always be mindful of what the bluff looks like. If it looks like a weak bluff or a lie given the action you might be in trouble.

Go to part 2 for the concluding part of this poker bluffing feature.

By Malcolm Clarke

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)

Tags: , , , , , ,


May 29 2010

Part 2 – How to Improve your Bluffing Ability

Category: Online poker tipsmalcolm @ 3:02 pm

In Part 1 we discussed that bluffing in Texas Hold’em poker is more complicated than simply betting when your opponent checks and hoping they fold. There will be pots that your opponent has shown interest in that you can force them to fold by “announcing” that you do indeed have a very strong hand (when you do not) and there is no option but to fold for your opponent. Sensing the timing for such moves is what separates the excellent millionaire cash game players from the rest of us mere mortals. But studying good bluffs and the metagame that goes into the decisions for when good players make such moves is part of the process when you learn poker.

Bluffing in Cash Game Poker

In cash games the conditions suit well-timed bluff attempts. Bluffs are useful to take a few pots that you would otherwise lose and you get plenty of time to assess the strengths and weaknesses of your opponents. When you see a certain play by your opponent that suggests a weaker hand this is bluffing territory. A good read on a player can make bluffing in cash game poker relatively low risk. More often than not semi-bluffing is used in cash games where high draws in particular are played with strong raises.

High stakes poker professionals make semi-bluffs more than full bluffs because at least if they are called they still have 40% equity in the hand. They are more than happy to flip for big pots because often opponents will fold anyway.

Bluffing in Tournament Poker

In tournament poker there is the ongoing issue to do with the rising blinds that force you to make plays that you would otherwise prefer to avoid. Bluffing in tournaments is slightly different and you need to bet hard in certain spots to force opponents to give up hands so you can survive in the blinds. Towards the end of a poker tournament it is more about the situation and chip stack you have rather than individual reads, but if you have a read that an opponent has a good hand then you can still make a good fold. Much of the time in tournaments you need to push around the medium stacks and players you know are a little too tight and will give up the hand to a good bet.

Do not Overdo It

Bluffing is not designed to be implemented in every hand. Sometimes you can feel bored and you get a sudden desperate feeling inside that “I must win this pot no matter what” and you try a marginal raise that really you should not make. I used to fight against this feeling all of the time. I wanted action! The correct move is to look for the correct conditions for a bluff. The timing of the bluff decides its success and an ill-timed bluff can be costly. Each time you make such a move you are risking chips without the back-up of a good hand. You therefore need to be pretty sure it is going to work before you do it.

There will, of course, be times when you run into your opponent slow playing a massive hand or holding cards strong enough to raise all-in. This happens and it is part of poker. But it is another reason not to overdo it too often; your opponents get good cards too!

By Malcolm Clarke

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Tags: , , , ,


May 05 2010

Stick with Holdem if it is Your Best Game

Category: Poker Blogmalcolm @ 3:43 pm

We poker writers preach variety to enhance your learning about many different forms of poker. Learning about Razz, Stud, Draw and PLO will help your overall understanding but if Texas Holdem is your best game then you are well served to continue playing it. Learning new games is great and little parts of those games can be used to enhance your overall understanding of poker in general but there is nothing wrong with being a Texas Holdem specialist and playing no other forms of Poker.

This view that you should play all forms of poker is generally a good thing I think. You get to experience a wide variety of poker and just because you play one form of poker most of the time does not mean there is another version of poker slightly better suited to you. The only way you can know if this is true is to play different games. Many blogs, like the bwin poker blog, advocate getting a full experience of poker by diversifying what you play. For me, I want to make money so whilst I enjoy variety; I stick with what works for me.

If you have one million hands of Texas holdem under your belt as a serious cash game player I think it is best if you continue to crush the online poker games whilst you still can. Never assume that poker is always going to be there. Right now in 2010 we are anticipating and predicting the full effects of the UIGEA gambling bill due for implementation into US law within a month. This could radically affect the availability of poker for American poker players but could have knock on effects for other countries if their governments observe the perceived benefits and follow suit with similar restrictive legislation.

With this in mind if you are a profitable texas holdem player my advice is to keep playing. I am not saying that our days of playing online poker are numbered but knowing you can win today means play today in my view. Remember the days when online cash games were a lot easier? Many players quit their jobs and made good money playing poker online and they thought that it would always be this way. Many of these players may be looking for work now as play has improved and only the best players can survive and the standard of modern online poker is much better than it used to be.

I am a true texas holdem player. I enjoy the game but I also enjoying playing draw poker and stud too. My strongest game is not Pot Limit Omaha which I find complicated and the large swings in both directions cause me pain. I enjoy the numbers associated with stud and find I feel comfortable in the game. Whatever game you play helps the other. Your appreciation of odds, implied odds and math are enhanced if you learn stud, you learn about handling variance and the art of playing aggressively when you play PLO and you learn about value betting in draw poker. Do not play one poker game thinking it is a different game, all of these disciplines fall under the moniker of “poker”.

But there is no reason to abandon texas holdem for the sake of learning something new. If you are good at it and make money from it, stick with it.

By Malcolm Clarke

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Tags: , , , , ,


Apr 21 2010

High Stakes Poker Report 21st April 2010

Category: Poker Newsmalcolm @ 10:02 am

For those players who contest $100,000 or more pots nearly everyday their action has been fairly standard this week. There are a few new names appearing at the top level of the game wanting to play poker online against the likes of durrrr and Ziigmund with varying results. Here is the story of the latest round of high stakes poker action. If you want to learn poker then railing these guys in action is a must for your poker studies. I am dreading the day poker rooms begin charging railbirds and hope it never happens!

Odonkor1 has been very active in the last few days. He is Joel Norqvist from Sweden who has been seen on the EPT and has appeared on Full Tilt willing to duke it out at the highest stakes with all of the big names and so far he has done very well, winning over $500,000 last week. There was speculation that his traits of playing very high, being a new player at the high stakes games and playing long sessions was very similar to another Swede, the infamous Isildur1. Are they the same person?

No-one knows whether they are one and the same, but there are striking similarities in their styles. Perhaps Viktor Blom was a decoy and Isildur1 is really Joel Norqvist? Now that would be a twist! If they are separate players then it is amazing that Martonas, Isildur1 and now Odonkor1 have torn up the high stakes poker scene and all three of these players are from Sweden, the new Mecca of young hotshot high stakes poker pros!

Sami Kelopuro has been around the high stakes scene for some time and is known as Larsluzak online. He has maintained a steady profit of around $500,000 this year which is very good but often has days of winning $100,000 and then losing a similar amount soon after. It is important for Larsluzak to start winning more consistently I think if he is to maintain his reputation as one of the best young players.

His results show profits as the highest stakes like $500/$1000 No Limit Texas Holdem Shorthanded play and ironically it is the lower limits where he seems to show the biggest losses. Is this Sami being outplayed or not taking the games as seriously? Sami does have a poker blog, but it is in Finnish, so I struggle to translate what he is saying, so perhaps he agrees with my assessments!

Tom “durrrr” Dwan’s peak earnings were at $9.9 million just before his big loss to Isildur1 in late 2009. He is currently showing a profit of $8 million so he is getting closer to his best earnings point. He seems to have put the 2009 loss behind him and is posting excellent scores each week and appears at the top of his game. Pokertableratings.com rate his play at the moment as 95 out of 100 so it is clear his stats support this belief that Tom is on top form. Since April 7th he has logged twelve online poker sessions and has profits of around $200,000 which is a steady win rate. Expect more of the same from durrrr in the coming months.

Gus Hansen was down as much as $1 million online according to pokertableratings but has been doing well of late and now shows a lifetime loss online of around $-300,000. Since April 7th Gus has logged a few sessions and is around $500,000 in profit. Hopefully this is a turning point for him online. He is known as super-aggressive but too willing to call off to river value bets. He has been known to have over 100 players waiting to play him online, which suggests his online reputation needs bolstering. With wins of $500,000 in two weeks, he may be on the way to achieving a better online poker image.

Look out for more high stakes poker reports in the near future.

By Malcolm Clarke

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Tags: , , , , , , ,


Feb 12 2010

If I Was Only Allowed One Form of Poker

Category: Texas Holdem FAQmalcolm @ 2:58 pm

Let’s assume that you force yourself to only focus on one type of Texas Hold’em poker game from this moment forward. What would you choose? Here is the case for each of the three main disciplines offered in poker. They are cash games; multi-table tournaments and single table sit and go poker tournaments.

Cash Games

Cash games are real money pots with real cash being won and lost every hand. Probably over half of all poker players would choose this as their preferred form of poker if they had to choose only one type of poker to play. Cash games are played with a specific strategy that once learned will form a solid foundation of your future poker playing.

Using good bankroll management you can work your way up and down the poker levels to manage swings of luck and if you are good enough at the strategy required in cash games you can show a consistent profit over time. Many players make over $100,000 from relatively small stakes by combining actual cash wins with rakeback or VIP player points and prizes.

Cash games are always available and accurate statistics can be kept on regular players to help your decision making and when you win, you win real money. You can also start and finish playing whenever you want and, perhaps crucially, you have full control over which table you play at and against which opponents. Game selection can enable you to always be contesting hands against players who you should beat.

Multi-table Poker Tournaments

Life changing wins can be obtained by winning a big poker tournament. Cash game wins are more consistent but compared to your buy-in a poker tournament win will be a lot higher. For those who like the chance to win big money and have a bankroll to withstand the swings of playing regular poker tournaments this would be a good game for you to play.

There are players like Shaun Deeb, who play only poker tournaments and show a good profit from doing so. Playing multi-table tournaments is not something many players would choose to do exclusively but if you understand the correct strategy to make it work you can show a good profit over time.

Single Table Sit and Go Poker Tournaments

SNG’s are a great way of learning final table strategy. As you are repeating the same blinds, chip stacks and bubble way once you understand the concepts of Sit and go play and the push fold ranges on the bubble you can play many of these tournaments at once and repeat the strategy over and over.

This is a relatively low risk way of building your bankroll as even against good players you are able to repeat sound strategy and show a decent profit. ROI (Return on Investment) of between 10% and 15% is very achievable over the long term for a good Sit and go single table tournament player.

The downside of SNG play is you never know who you will play against until players begin to register and often there is too large of a playing pool to know whether you should unregister based on the other players joining the game.

My own choice would have to be cash games. My favourite game is playing Sit and go’s, but cash games are the bread and butter of the quality poker player. You would need to play many $10 SNG’s at a 10% ROI to earn enough to make a living whilst playing cash games this could be done playing less hours but having more of an edge over the players you choose to play against. Poker tournaments are what I use for a shot at a big prize depending on my success in other forms of poker so I would be hesitant to play these exclusively.

By Malcolm Clarke

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 9.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Tags: , , , ,


Jan 28 2010

Talking about poker bankrolls part three

Category: Poker strategycarl @ 5:27 pm

In the third and final part of this series then and following on from part two, this highlights another so called piece of poker wisdom that is wrong and that is that just because a player is playing successfully at $100-$200 Hold’em online for instance, that they can beat all of the levels below that. Maybe they can but chances are that they can’t for the reason that I stated. As I have said many times, there is a lot of rubbish spoken in poker and much of the advice that is bandied about is far too generic for it to be of any use whatsoever.

Because of my very cautious attitude to money then what I had to do was to basically trick my mind into playing with large amounts of money. What worked for me personally was to take $2000 for instance that I had earned down some other gambling avenue and to use it to take a shot in a poker game. If I lost it then I would not play until I had mentally absorbed the loss.

This brings up yet another point of why the slide rule “experts” have missed the point. Let us go back to the case of the 18K poker bankroll. What if you are the type of person that tilts easily or simply cannot mentally absorb a loss until a certain amount of time has passed. If you have lost 1K in the blink of an eye in a big no limit pot with an unbelievable outdraw then you are hardly the type of person that can be entrusted to have another seventeen grand at their disposal immediately can you.

If everyone had to wait until they had the correct theoretical poker bankroll available before they could play at any level then hardly anyone would be playing the game. Here’s another thing, do you really have to play down to the felt and lose all of your bankroll before you admit to yourself or find out that a particular level of poker is too difficult for you. If the “experts” say that you need 12K to play theoretically at a certain level to avoid going bust then what if you stump up the money but are wrong in your assessment of your abilities.

If you are five grand down, do you play on just because you have another seven in your poker bankroll before you say “oh well, better drop down a level but I will have to wait until I have got some more money because I have lost it all trying to prove that I could beat 20-40 holdem”.

This is insane and utter madness. The upshot of all this is that don’t go along with what you hear about poker bankrolls and just do whatever makes you feel the most comfortable because if you are uncomfortable then this will affect your game plain and simple. If a bankroll approach helps you then fine, if you prefer a no bankroll approach then that is fine also but too much rubbish is spouted in this area by people who have never tried to gamble for a living and I think that you know my views on them by now.

Carl “The Dean” Sampson

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 8.5/10 (2 votes cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Tags: , , , , ,


Jan 28 2010

Talking about bankrolls in poker part one

Category: Poker strategycarl @ 5:06 pm

The subject of bankrolls and how much money to have behind you gets talked about an awful lot and just like anything else, most of it is WRONG. Much of this RUBBISH has been spoken by people who have never played poker or gambled in their entire lives. I have my very own attitude towards bankrolls and financing my playing that has worked very well for me.

Firstly let me state something blatantly obvious, a poker bankroll will not turn a losing player into a winning player. When you hear about big stakes players frequently going bust then so much for bankrolls. But I have always argued that any part time semi-professional player simply does not need one if they have other sources of income that is disposable.

For example, let us take what used to be my bread and butter game of $30-$60 Limit Holdem poker once upon a time. All the books say that any working pro who wins at a rate of one big bet an hour ($60) needs at least 300 big bets to avoid going broke. But that is $18,000 which is a very substantial amount of money to many people. But what if you don’t have that kind of money then does this mean that you can never play 30-60.

But what if you do have that kind of money, does this mean that you can automatically jump right in, I say no to both. What if you have the skills to play 30-60 holdem but not the mindset to want to risk 18K. What if the mere thought of having this mental eighteen grand disturbs you so much that it drags you away from your optimal game. Also, what about the guy who starts off playing at 30-60 with his 18K bankroll and despite being a very good poker player, is down $9000 after a couple of months and then packs it in because the fear of losing it all has affected him.

Any player that does this has not in theory started with $18,000 but actually $9000 and a 9K bankroll is not big enough for 30-60. But the mathematicians in the gambling world make me laugh because they churn pathetic advice out to people that is based on figures and nothing but figures as if Hold’em poker online is played by emotionless robots. Much of what they talk about is unworkable for many people and looks good when seen on paper or in a book.

It is exactly the same principle with financial advice, it would be blatantly wrong to advise someone to transfer money from a much lower interest bank account to an investment that was linked to the stock market all because the FTSE had risen by an average of 10% per year since it was formed and the bank account in question was only providing 3% at best without finding out certain things about the nature of that person first. Look out for the second part of this article elsewhere on the site.

Carl “The Dean” Sampson

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 8.5/10 (2 votes cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Tags: , , , ,


Jan 27 2010

Risky Bankroll Management

Category: Poker strategymalcolm @ 10:08 am

Never would I try and persuade people to manage their bankroll less than safely nor would I encourage or dissuade gambling of any kind, it is your choice. Personally I play Texas Holdem with a high regard for money and this allows me to stay in the game and minimise the pain when I lose because the participation in poker is at the limits I am comfortable playing. Whilst I minimise the gamble, many participate in poker in such a way that increases it.

For some players being dangerous with their bankroll is part of the fun. Phil Ivey was quoted recently saying that he enjoys the empty feeling of disaster when faced with a big loss. Phil is therefore happy to play a dangerous game with his money and has no fear of losing it. He does not get a buzz from low limit poker and plays as high as he can because only larger amounts of money mean anything to him due to his vast wealth.

Being conservative with your bankroll is recommended because it is easy to go on tilt and start chasing money. When I worked in the bookmaking Industry I watched people get into a series of losses then start chasing their losses making irresponsible wagers. Their bets got bigger as their losses got bigger, compounding the loss. Sometimes they won and were saved and other times they had to leave with a disproportionate loss.

There is nothing wrong with taking a shot at a higher game in poker. Many players do this within sensible bankroll management. Their normal amount of buy-ins for cash games may be thirty buy-ins and when they reach a point where they have twenty buy-ins for the next level they take a shot. If they lose they move back down and try to re-build and if they win they stay at the higher level until they can move up again or suffer losses dictating a drop. Their sensible approach is maintained by the moving up and down through the levels to remain safe.

Your income outside of poker should be a factor in how risky you are prepared to be with your bankroll. If you have $1000 and you can re-load that amount every month then you can be more inclined to gamble with it than a person to whom that $1000 is everything they have. Many players are prepared to risk $100 each month to try and run it up into something more. Providing this $100 is not required elsewhere then this is fine. Your own personal and professional circumstances will dictate what an acceptable amount of money to play poker is for you.

Note that risky bankroll management is not taking your last $215 and buying into a large poker tournament on a Sunday. That is not risky, just stupid. Risky bankroll management is anything whereby a normal swing in poker could result in going bust, for a winning player. This must be a conscious decision that you are truly at ease with if you play poker this way.

This article is relevant only for those who Play Texas Hold’em and are winning players. If you lose your money will be lost no matter how well you manage your bankroll. Poker players who ignore bankroll management can suffer a standard downswing and be ruined. Bankroll management is poker risk management and very important to staying in the game and allowing the downswings to run their course before returning to profit.

There is no reason, however, that if you wish to be slightly bolder with your bankroll that you cannot do this providing your circumstances allow and the reason for your wish to live dangerously is not just to satisfy a gambling urge. You should always keep the euphoria of gambling under control and make the right decisions for your poker game when relating to your bankroll.

By Malcolm Clarke

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 8.7/10 (3 votes cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)

Tags: , , , , , ,


Jan 18 2010

Freshen Up Poker with a Change

Category: Poker Blogmalcolm @ 12:26 pm

If you are a regular online poker player you can often feel like the game gets very repetitive. You may sit every day on the online poker tables and watch the same poker software playing against the same players and the grind can seem very grinding indeed. Perhaps you need a change either focusing on poker tournaments instead of cash games or vice versa. Avoiding burn out and looking for the signs of burn out are important to becoming and remaining a winning poker player.

Running multiple cash game tables removes the feeling of being involved on every table. Feeling a part of the cash game keeps you interested but if you are moving to and from different tables quickly then you feel like you are almost above the action and only a small part of it. This can resonate into a player becoming bored very quickly, which can compound any losses and make players leave a session early.

You could change your poker room and try a new site to keep things feeling fresh. Something as simple as looking at a different table style on a different poker room with different usernames playing poker can cause you to instantly perk up and feel more enthusiastic about playing poker. Do you ever get bored of seeing the same view from your office window? Although the feeling of buoyancy if you moved positions in the office is temporary, the feelings are real and you can harness these positive feelings by enforcing change in your poker routine.

Shaun Deeb, the online poker tournament phenom who played around thirty poker tournaments per day on multiple tables is currently on a break from tournaments after admitting to be completely burned out by them. Playing thirty tables per day I am surprised he was not burned out sooner, yet it shows even the best players recognise the need to change or take a break. He will probably come back a more dangerous player and enjoy renewed sustained success as a result of this self imposed vacation.

The right time to make a change is when things are not going well for you. The best time to make a change is just before the run of bad poker which comes about either through luck or self-inflicted bad play. Recognise the signs that you are becoming fidgety or on edge with the poker room or games before it turns into losses.

Remember, however, that grinding online poker is not easy and you must endure it to some extent exactly like a person working a full time job needs to do. You should enjoy playing poker but sometimes you will want to do something else and this is the point where you must be professional and grind it out. The research you have done on fellow players and hand histories you have worked on are lost if you change sites so some degree of pain is tolerable in the poker grind. If you work a normal job then you will probably regularly feel this way but stick it out and keep trying hard to win.

Playing on a new poker room will reignite your interest in poker as every room as different poker tournaments to participate in with slightly different structures, prize pools and bonuses. Try bwin.com which is backed up by the large sports betting company. Aesthetically the dark style of poker software and table layouts they use will be enough to make you feel fresh even when you play a lot of online poker.

By Malcolm Clarke

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 8.0/10 (2 votes cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Tags: , , , ,


Dec 08 2009

Low Stakes Poker to Air Next Summer

Category: Poker Blogmalcolm @ 8:48 am

Fox Network has recorded a new Poker TV show which any poker player can take part in. They have enjoyed great success with their show “High Stakes Poker” where fans sit back in awe watching players willing to play at the highest stakes fight for pots worth sometimes over $500,000 of real money. The new show is going to be called “Low Stakes Poker” and Fox believes this will relate to every poker player as something they understand and could take part in.

It is a shrewd move by Fox who appreciate that the player pool at the top level of Texas Hold ‘em poker are a close knit group and the players style is governed on High Stakes Poker many times by previous history with the opponent. Playing at lower stakes the show will be more about standard play highlighting the flaws in the player’s games. Closing these leaks will help the participating players get better without costing a lot of money.

The action is $0.02/$0.04 meaning that an adequate bankroll for this game would be around fifty to one hundred dollars of real money if you follow the recommended guidelines of good bankroll management. Of course players will turn up to this poker show with their last ten dollars, that is the nature of good poker television.

Fox are keen to show that they do not share the blasé attitude that the top poker players have to large losses at the poker table on shows like Poker after Dark or High Stakes Poker. In the current economic climate they appreciate that times are tough and they want to encourage poker players that fun games can be found at any level of poker and you do not need to risk it all at the high stakes poker tables. If you only have $10 to play poker with there are still games to play and you should play hard just as if you had $10,000 at the table. This is a view shared by Kevin Reilly of Fox.

Kevin is quoted as saying that the decadence of poker players and their tolerance to large amounts of risk is not something they wish to promote too hard. They do go to incredible lengths to ensure comparisons with High Stakes Poker are obvious only in their difference to it. Play was recorded on an Air Hockey table in a public area and not in the closed and securely guarded room in the casino. Players had bundles of nickels rather than the thick wad of dollar bills used by the high stakes participants. This does not mean the players do not try in low stakes poker and the value of money is stressed at all times.

It is pleasing to see that the TV network appreciates that the value of money depends solely on the individual. Many lower stakes poker players would feel just as bad losing $10 as a high stakes player like Tom Dwan would feel losing $100,000. In Low Stakes Poker every player is fighting for the chips no matter what their value.

Rather than the pots being $180,000 they are more like $18, but hopefully people will still enjoy the entertainment. The players selected are likely to make up for the lack of large cash pots with superb entertainment and some slapstick humour. You can expect an inadvertent High Stakes Poker spoof show with serious poker being played as players realise the stakes are small and viewers do not tune in for the poker pots like they do on High Stakes Poker. For many of them this is their moment in the spotlight and they will ensure you are entertained thoroughly. Phil Hellmuth is taking part and this will ensure plenty of lively banter at the table.

I cannot wait for this show to air and only hope it is shown in the UK where I am based. This could be something very popular and something most players could participate in and aspire to be part of. Make sure you tune in to what could become a cult poker sites in 2010 and could see many players join in at the lower stakes games.

By Malcolm Clarke

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 6.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Tags: , , , , , ,


Next Page »