I was into something that was really disturbing.
The other night, I played with my friends. There was player A, B, and so on and so forth. Player A went all in and I called the all in as player B. Then next was player C who raised and player D called.
Later on, I tried to check but some did told me that I have to call or fold player C because of having some chips. I was hesitant to do any of the two for I only wanted to compete for the all in and not the side pot actually.
If you were on my shoes that time, what will you do?
Gian
Gian,
Since player C had more chips than you, you had to either call their raise, or fold. The side pot is still part of the original hand. You cannot only compete for the main pot.
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Tags: all-in, call, flop, fold, raise
Up to this time while writing this, I’m still bothered about a certain situation that came up in one of our home games.
Well, three players were left in the pot and at the turn the 1st player to act bet. Eventually, the 2nd player to act called and then the 3rd player raised. After which, the 1st player called and the 2nd player re-raised. Someone at the table who was not in the hand called a foul for he thought a re-raise after a call was not supposedly possible.
Personally, I thought it was a check raise so I haven’t reacted.
What do you think?
Regards,
Jayden
Jayden,
A check-raise is when a player checks the betting to another opponent, that opponent bet and then you raise. What your opponent did was known as a limp-raise. This is perfectly acceptable. When a player raises as opposed to calling a bet, they are reopening the action to other players. The players have the same options to call, raise, or fold. Would your opponent objected to your other opponent calling and then folding to a raise? Not likely.
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Tags: call, check raise, fold, home games, limp-raise, raise
