May 29 2010

Part 1 – How to Improve your Bluffing Ability

Category: Online poker tipsmalcolm @ 3:04 pm

My efforts to improve my Texas Holdem poker game never stop. I try to work on every part of my game and improve every area to hopefully make that big breakthrough to either crush the cash games or poker tournaments I play in. An important aspect of poker that is fun, but very difficult to do well, is bluffing. I have read many poker strategy articles and from my own experience these are some of the things to learn about in relation to bluffing.

Pick Spots Wisely

During a hand you may feel there is an opening to win the pot there and then. For example, during a Texas Hold ‘em hand your opponent may stop betting and after checking to you on the turn after the action went check-check on the flop you may consider betting with a weak hand. If your opponent is not a trappy player, you may win the hand at this point with a solid bet.

Note that in this case you have spotted an opportunity and made the bluff bet because of it. You have not simply bet randomly. Pick your spots wisely. Against a player that will usually showdown bottom pair, this is not the right time to make a pot sized bet with Ace high. Against a fish, bluffs have less value; the thing to do against fish is have a good hand because they will play with you. Bluff better players as a general rule, because they can fold!

Be Consistently Inconsistent

Deception is a massive part of poker. You want to make opponents as unsure as you possibly can over your motives when you bet, raise or check. Each action, in an ideal world, should be able to be interpreted in many different ways. Frankly this is all but impossible to do because you are either tight or loose generally, but try and be consistently different in how you play your hands in terms of strength. Bluffing on the flop, turn or river and betting when you have a good hand in a similar situation plants the seeds of doubt in the mind of your opponents. If they are uncertain and they have a marginal hand, it is very difficult to carry on in the hand.

Watch Tom Dwan play cash games, many of his opponents fold because they know he could be bluffing or betting a monster. He plays the same way whether strong or weak and this creates his deception. It is very effective and has made him millions of dollars.

Tell a Story

If the story developing through the hand does not fit your bluff it is likely to be called. In the following example this is explained more clearly.

You raise 3 x the big blind in late position holding 7c-7d as the first player into the hand and are called by one player in the blinds. The flop is, Kh-As-8s. The player bets half the pot and you call. The turn is a 2c. He bets half the pot and you raise as a bluff steal. This is not a good time to attempt a steal.

Why? He/she has shown action on two streets. There are overcards to your pocket pair and by betting your opponent has said “I am interested in this hand”. The turn card was a total blank given the action and yet your opponent still bet. You flat called on the flop and raise the turn. This does not appear consistent with the betting. A two could not have helped your hand. Unless your opponent thinks you are slowplaying a huge monster they must call you. Always be mindful of what the bluff looks like. If it looks like a weak bluff or a lie given the action you might be in trouble.

Go to part 2 for the concluding part of this poker bluffing feature.

By Malcolm Clarke

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)

Tags: , , , , , ,


May 29 2010

Part 2 – How to Improve your Bluffing Ability

Category: Online poker tipsmalcolm @ 3:02 pm

In Part 1 we discussed that bluffing in Texas Hold’em poker is more complicated than simply betting when your opponent checks and hoping they fold. There will be pots that your opponent has shown interest in that you can force them to fold by “announcing” that you do indeed have a very strong hand (when you do not) and there is no option but to fold for your opponent. Sensing the timing for such moves is what separates the excellent millionaire cash game players from the rest of us mere mortals. But studying good bluffs and the metagame that goes into the decisions for when good players make such moves is part of the process when you learn poker.

Bluffing in Cash Game Poker

In cash games the conditions suit well-timed bluff attempts. Bluffs are useful to take a few pots that you would otherwise lose and you get plenty of time to assess the strengths and weaknesses of your opponents. When you see a certain play by your opponent that suggests a weaker hand this is bluffing territory. A good read on a player can make bluffing in cash game poker relatively low risk. More often than not semi-bluffing is used in cash games where high draws in particular are played with strong raises.

High stakes poker professionals make semi-bluffs more than full bluffs because at least if they are called they still have 40% equity in the hand. They are more than happy to flip for big pots because often opponents will fold anyway.

Bluffing in Tournament Poker

In tournament poker there is the ongoing issue to do with the rising blinds that force you to make plays that you would otherwise prefer to avoid. Bluffing in tournaments is slightly different and you need to bet hard in certain spots to force opponents to give up hands so you can survive in the blinds. Towards the end of a poker tournament it is more about the situation and chip stack you have rather than individual reads, but if you have a read that an opponent has a good hand then you can still make a good fold. Much of the time in tournaments you need to push around the medium stacks and players you know are a little too tight and will give up the hand to a good bet.

Do not Overdo It

Bluffing is not designed to be implemented in every hand. Sometimes you can feel bored and you get a sudden desperate feeling inside that “I must win this pot no matter what” and you try a marginal raise that really you should not make. I used to fight against this feeling all of the time. I wanted action! The correct move is to look for the correct conditions for a bluff. The timing of the bluff decides its success and an ill-timed bluff can be costly. Each time you make such a move you are risking chips without the back-up of a good hand. You therefore need to be pretty sure it is going to work before you do it.

There will, of course, be times when you run into your opponent slow playing a massive hand or holding cards strong enough to raise all-in. This happens and it is part of poker. But it is another reason not to overdo it too often; your opponents get good cards too!

By Malcolm Clarke

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Tags: , , , ,


Mar 19 2010

The Professional Poker Player Debate in 2010

Category: Poker Blogmalcolm @ 7:56 am

Playing Texas Hold’em poker for a living sounds great to me as I sit at my desk. In fact, it has sounded great to me ever since I realised that playing a lot of hands at modest stakes can yield excellent profits from playing poker from home via internet poker. But as we are prone to assess things with rose tinted spectacles there are both positive and negative aspects of the debates. This article will update these debates to issues relevant to us in 2010.

Standard of Games

I read many contradictions on the standard of poker now and in the past. Most poker articles in 2007 discussed a massive change happening in the games where they went from super-soft (apparently) to games where a solid grasp of Poker strategy was necessary. Even at the micro stakes you were urged to get poker training and learn the fundamentals. But surely you needed to do this anyway otherwise you are simply one of the many fish. I am unconvinced that the games are much more difficult now than they were at the micro-limits and I am equally unconvinced they were ever as soft as everyone says. If you are a great player you will win and if you are a weak player you will lose. There were just more weak players in the past that’s all.

To be a professional you must show a good win rate at levels where this win rate equates to over around £15,000 per year or $25,000. Any less and I think you will struggle to maintain even a reasonable standard of living including when downswings occur and money is tighter.

Life Considerations for a Pro

Getting a mortgage in the UK is going to be very difficult for a single professional poker player. In the current economic climate I would suggest that right now (March 2010) unless you can buy a property outright then you will not get borrowing on the back of insecure income streams like Poker. Whilst we know a good win rate is possible and you may well have the graphs to support your skill projections, we all know that in any gambling enterprise “current success is not a guarantee of future performance”. Even if you are fairly sure you will continue to win, other people and in particular money lenders, will not be.

Solutions for 2010 Onwards

Income you make from Poker is currently tax free in the UK and there are no Political plans to have that reviewed in the near future as far as we know. This means that you only need to earn what you want in your hand rather than account for a loss of 10% – 20% in taxes. This makes life a little easier and also increases the monetary value in real terms of anything you win at the poker table. Developing a share fund or other investments is easier to build without the burden of losing income to tax and due to the insecurity of poker as a main income stream this is highly recommended.

Other Opportunities

I advocate players consider other ways than poker to secure their income. Property investment, although not a massive opportunity right now, is a great way to potentially earn money in a buoyant market and Poker players often have spare cash lying around that usually just gets gambled and played with. Why not use that money to generate a business of some sort whether shares, investments like property or buying a small business already trading to manage.

Playing poker professionally is tough but if managed correctly could give you a much better quality of life due to its fundamental freedom. I would take whatever measures I could if I was a pro to secure my income as far as I can to allow me to keep that freedom that Poker affords its professionals.

Having a secure financial future can be achieved through poker but also a combination of all the financial things at a person disposal with cash to invest. If you earn it, invest it. But keep some of it to play poker at great rooms like bwin.com who are constantly improving their delivery of online poker to players from all around the world.

By Malcolm Clarke

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Tags: , , , , ,


Mar 10 2010

Beating Double or Nothing SNG Tournaments

Category: Online poker tipsmalcolm @ 3:40 pm

Poker theory changes so fast you can never be sure that you are reading current theory. A poker book that was written in 2006 may have some good information in 2010, but alas not enough. This article will be good for anyone wanting to play Double or Nothing Sit and go poker tournaments in 2010, but possibly not if you come across it in 2013. Nevertheless, these general concepts will remain the same and you should be aware of them.

You will find DON poker tournaments in most online poker rooms. They are a uniquely structured tournament where the top five finishers win and double their money (less the rake) and the bottom five finishers, as the Weakest Link host Anne Robinson says, ‘they leave with nothing’. You must be able to cash in around 65% of these tournaments to show a good win rate over time and they are only profitable when multi-tabling as you must reduce the amount of time it takes to run out this marginal profit. This is why some players leave them alone, but others enjoy the low-risk nature of them and they are very beatable.

Grinder Alert!

Other poker players will be grinding these tournaments. You can spot who these may be in a number of ways. Grinders will fold around 95% or more of their hands in the opening two levels of play. It is easy therefore to make a note of the players who literally fold everything. After the opening two rounds you should be able to spot these players easily. A tool like Sharkscope is useful also, but bear in mind that in 2010 this tool must be opt-in and players can choose not to, therefore masking their profits and their ability.

Early Stages – First Two Levels

Watch out for the grinders and make a note. These are the players you will need to avoid later on as they play their hands optimally in this structure. You need to play like them and fold most of your hands. The key to the early stages is taking no risks to accumulate chips which are not worth the actual gains in tournament equity (ICM).

The early levels are about survival, but if you get a premium hand then play it strongly. If a couple of players are eliminated here then things are looking good for you.

Middle Stages – Third and Fourth Level

When the ante appears we have more reason to steal the blinds. Think position because this is important and you should still be relatively tight, although loosening off as the blinds get higher in relation to your stack. Rarely call raises unless you are holding AA or KK. Even AK is easily beaten and whether or not I play AK depends on your opponents previous hands.

If you play a hand you should be first into the pot when it is folded to you in position.

Endgame – Above 100/200

Hopefully we are down to six or seven players now. Almost immediately bubble play takes over. I have read many articles on DON strategy and they all advocate never calling all-in. All-in is a powerful way to maintain a stack but you need to be first into the pot to make this move. I would call all-in with AA, KK or QQ if I am honest, but others advocate an even tighter approach. With blinds high and plenty of folding and all-ins, it is only a matter of time before a confrontation that could end the tournament occurs.

The ability to quickly adjust throughout the tournaments is important to DON SNG success. Bubble play is also critical and if you are a good SNG player already with a good knowledge and appreciation of ICM (Independent Chip Modelling) theory then you are primed to do very well at these enjoyable poker tournaments.

By Malcolm Clarke

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Tags: , , , , , , , ,


Jan 28 2010

Talking about poker bankrolls part three

Category: Poker strategycarl @ 5:27 pm

In the third and final part of this series then and following on from part two, this highlights another so called piece of poker wisdom that is wrong and that is that just because a player is playing successfully at $100-$200 Hold’em online for instance, that they can beat all of the levels below that. Maybe they can but chances are that they can’t for the reason that I stated. As I have said many times, there is a lot of rubbish spoken in poker and much of the advice that is bandied about is far too generic for it to be of any use whatsoever.

Because of my very cautious attitude to money then what I had to do was to basically trick my mind into playing with large amounts of money. What worked for me personally was to take $2000 for instance that I had earned down some other gambling avenue and to use it to take a shot in a poker game. If I lost it then I would not play until I had mentally absorbed the loss.

This brings up yet another point of why the slide rule “experts” have missed the point. Let us go back to the case of the 18K poker bankroll. What if you are the type of person that tilts easily or simply cannot mentally absorb a loss until a certain amount of time has passed. If you have lost 1K in the blink of an eye in a big no limit pot with an unbelievable outdraw then you are hardly the type of person that can be entrusted to have another seventeen grand at their disposal immediately can you.

If everyone had to wait until they had the correct theoretical poker bankroll available before they could play at any level then hardly anyone would be playing the game. Here’s another thing, do you really have to play down to the felt and lose all of your bankroll before you admit to yourself or find out that a particular level of poker is too difficult for you. If the “experts” say that you need 12K to play theoretically at a certain level to avoid going bust then what if you stump up the money but are wrong in your assessment of your abilities.

If you are five grand down, do you play on just because you have another seven in your poker bankroll before you say “oh well, better drop down a level but I will have to wait until I have got some more money because I have lost it all trying to prove that I could beat 20-40 holdem”.

This is insane and utter madness. The upshot of all this is that don’t go along with what you hear about poker bankrolls and just do whatever makes you feel the most comfortable because if you are uncomfortable then this will affect your game plain and simple. If a bankroll approach helps you then fine, if you prefer a no bankroll approach then that is fine also but too much rubbish is spouted in this area by people who have never tried to gamble for a living and I think that you know my views on them by now.

Carl “The Dean” Sampson

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 8.5/10 (2 votes cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Tags: , , , , ,


Jan 28 2010

Talking about bankrolls in poker part two

Category: Poker strategycarl @ 5:15 pm

Carrying on from part one then, this is all well and good with regards to what was mentioned at the end of part one but if the person involved has what is called a “very low attitude to risk” then they should not be doing it. If they are not psychologically inclined to be able to ride the sometimes violent fluctuations in the market then investing in that kind of thing is wrong for them.

Also if the stock market went through one of its steep downward trends like it did a few years ago and this person panicked and withdrew their money through ignorance or fear then they would have lost a very substantial amount of money, I know people personally who did and it was a very sad sight.

How you handle your money has basically an awful lot to do with what suits you as a person and not what someone says that you should do or what I or anybody else has done for that matter. I had a very low attitude to risk when I first started playing, I wanted to play professional level poker but this means playing for sizeable amounts of money and this was something that I found very uncomfortable.

So I had a very serious problem to overcome with regards to playing online poker, I had two parts of my personality that were basically at war with each other. On one side was this person that had a burning desire to play poker at a high level and on the other side was my more cautious and play it safe self holding me back.

A lot of books say that the answer to this is to start playing poker at low levels and slowly work your way up and build a bankroll and taking sign up bonuses along the way to boost it. Once again this is RUBBISH, anyone who plays low level poker and especially Limit Texas Hold’em will be likely beaten by the effect of the rake. It is not so bad in No Limit and this is why I advise players to go down this route. There is a world of difference between a $1-$2 Limit game and a $1-$2 No Limit game.

The Limit poker game will have about an average pot size of 5/6 big bets whereas the No Limit game will have on average at least double that for most games. The best player on the table can be a loser in a low stakes limit game and few players earn decent money out of it even allowing for multi-tabling online. But there is another subtle but highly significant reason why this advice is wrong and that has to do with personal motivation. One of the best pieces of advice that I ever heard about selecting the right level to play at for you went like this,

Play at a level that motivates not intimidates

This simple statement highlights a reason why many players fail in poker. They play at a level that is too small to mean anything to them and they end up not focusing or playing properly and basically messing about on the table. This means that they lose money, maybe not all at once but slowly but surely drip feeding it over time.

The level has to motivate you enough to play properly without it scaring you, once you identify this level THEN you have found the correct level to play at and not what any book or anyone else tells you.

Carl “The Dean” Sampson

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 8.5/10 (2 votes cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Tags: , , ,


Jan 28 2010

Talking about bankrolls in poker part one

Category: Poker strategycarl @ 5:06 pm

The subject of bankrolls and how much money to have behind you gets talked about an awful lot and just like anything else, most of it is WRONG. Much of this RUBBISH has been spoken by people who have never played poker or gambled in their entire lives. I have my very own attitude towards bankrolls and financing my playing that has worked very well for me.

Firstly let me state something blatantly obvious, a poker bankroll will not turn a losing player into a winning player. When you hear about big stakes players frequently going bust then so much for bankrolls. But I have always argued that any part time semi-professional player simply does not need one if they have other sources of income that is disposable.

For example, let us take what used to be my bread and butter game of $30-$60 Limit Holdem poker once upon a time. All the books say that any working pro who wins at a rate of one big bet an hour ($60) needs at least 300 big bets to avoid going broke. But that is $18,000 which is a very substantial amount of money to many people. But what if you don’t have that kind of money then does this mean that you can never play 30-60.

But what if you do have that kind of money, does this mean that you can automatically jump right in, I say no to both. What if you have the skills to play 30-60 holdem but not the mindset to want to risk 18K. What if the mere thought of having this mental eighteen grand disturbs you so much that it drags you away from your optimal game. Also, what about the guy who starts off playing at 30-60 with his 18K bankroll and despite being a very good poker player, is down $9000 after a couple of months and then packs it in because the fear of losing it all has affected him.

Any player that does this has not in theory started with $18,000 but actually $9000 and a 9K bankroll is not big enough for 30-60. But the mathematicians in the gambling world make me laugh because they churn pathetic advice out to people that is based on figures and nothing but figures as if Hold’em poker online is played by emotionless robots. Much of what they talk about is unworkable for many people and looks good when seen on paper or in a book.

It is exactly the same principle with financial advice, it would be blatantly wrong to advise someone to transfer money from a much lower interest bank account to an investment that was linked to the stock market all because the FTSE had risen by an average of 10% per year since it was formed and the bank account in question was only providing 3% at best without finding out certain things about the nature of that person first. Look out for the second part of this article elsewhere on the site.

Carl “The Dean” Sampson

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 8.5/10 (2 votes cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Tags: , , , ,


Jan 14 2010

Playing Poker in Position

Category: Poker strategymalcolm @ 11:12 am

When you play Texas Hold ‘em poker online and started playing some tournaments or cash games you will have noticed the strength that comes with being in position. Opponents respect position and late position especially affords chances to play different hands and exploit the temporary strong place in the action you hold. Everyone gets a chance to be in position so you should be exploiting every opportunity to benefit from it as your opponents will be able to do the same things to you in just a few hands time.

According to where you are sitting at the poker table in Texas Hold ‘em some hands are playable and others are not, unless you decide to bluff. When you are directly to the left of the big blind, known as “under the gun or UTG” you are first to act pre-flop and then third to act post flop if both blinds remain in the hand. Playing a hand without seeing what every other member of the table is doing is obviously a disadvantage which is why recommended poker strategy says you should fold most hands from early position.

In online poker, players began to realise the negative image that under the gun players have. Clever players realised that a raise from under the gun, therefore out of position, looks very strong. Against a tight player you can limp in under the gun and re-raise in a bluff squeeze play to win the pot pre-flop. This requires real knowledge on your part that the opponent you are making the squeeze play on can fold.

Online poker strategy has come full circle as if you are a tight player acting under the gun your perceived hand range is probably AA, KK, AK or QQ when you make the re-raise and if you still receive action you need to be cautious. If you hold Aces pre-flop then a re-raise all-in is the natural play, but what do you do with anything less? Depending on your opponent Queens will probably be played if you feel he could make the play with anything less than a premium hand. Remember your position under the gun signifies strength so having the late position player re-raising or raising your limp narrows his range to stronger hands. You do, however, need to be cautious and becoming creative from early position is an advanced strategy in poker.

Let us imagine you hold JJ under the gun. You limp in for 2 dollars in a $1/$2 no limit cash game and are called by the button. The big blind checks. The flop comes down 3s-5d-Td. The big blind checks to you and you bet out a pot sized bet of $7 and the button player raises to $27 costing you a further $20 to call. The big blind folds, so what do you do? He has limped pre-flop so you can rule out overpairs unless you know he is tricky. He could easily have a suited connector giving a straight or flush draw, or he could have 99 or 88. There is the chance of a set although TT would probably have seen a re-raise. You call the $20. The pot is now $61. The turn is a Qd. Now you can either bet out or check.

In this spot you would love to see what the opponent does before checking. (Of course you could check but as you have checked if your opponent bets this is not as telling as if they acted first). Fearing the flush and set or overpair you check. He bets $45. You feel bad but you fold. Why fold? There are so many hands that beat you and the only thing you are beating is an Ace rag hand and there are now overcards. If they had AQ they are winning, KQ of diamonds is now ahead.

Swap the positions at the table and you would have re-raised with jacks pre-flop after the under the gun limp (assuming he took the same action) and perhaps took down the hand. Any suited connector the opponent held would have really struggled to come up with a reason to play out of position when you are betting big from late position. Notice that once the late position player starting betting in our example things got uncomfortable for us. Remember that when you are playing, position is a big part of winning poker.

By Malcolm Clarke

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 8.0/10 (2 votes cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)

Tags: , , ,


Dec 30 2009

Easy Fixes for Common Poker Tournament Errors

Category: Texas Holdem FAQmalcolm @ 11:09 am

Texas Hold ‘em poker tournaments are available 24/7 to play online and you can shoot for big prizes participating in many live poker tournaments once you gain some experience. Unfortunately it is very difficult to play like World Champion Joe Cada and win a massive tournament like the World Series of Poker. Even Joe got very lucky to win. But aside from luck, you must have a solid set of fundamental skills in order to put yourself in a position to benefit from good luck and win possibly life changing prizes.

There are many poker software programs like Pokerstove that calculate your specific equity in a pre-determined spot which is excellent for hand analysis however you must be making good decisions at the table during live poker play. There are a number of common errors that are easily fixable and once addressed they result in an immediate improvement in your poker game.

Three Betting Too Lightly

AA, KK and QQ are good three betting hands. If you start three betting with hands like JJ, TT, 99, 88, AQ and AJ then you are perhaps being a little loose. Often a player’s raise is very legitimate in building the pot because they have a good hand. Re-raising with the second set of weaker premium hands exposes you to a large pot when you are already dominated. In poker tournaments any player with a good starting hand will not fold to your re-raise and most often will shove into you so three betting must be done with care.

Middle pairs are played for value trying to hit the set. Would you rather wait to have your made hand and see what the early action is or speculate with a marginal hand? Most players prefer to get their money in better than a middle pair that is likely to face overcards after the flop. Tighten up your three betting range unless you specifically want to bluff or semi-bluff. Only ever do this on purpose and do not get dragged into an uncomfortable spot because you unwittingly over value certain hands that are good for one raise but vulnerable in a raised pot.

Calling an All-in Bet

Admittedly I have fallen foul of this myself many times. The tough spots are when you have a decent but not great hand like AJ or KQ and you are unsure whether your opponent is bluffing or not. Factors like your opponents stacks sizes in relation to the blinds, your stack in relation to your opponents and how much it is to call are important. You should be particularly careful when calling the all-in shove by your opponent will mean you risk your tournament life.

Not Profiling Players Properly

Failing to have good information when faced with a big decision is a very common fault of many cash game poker players and tournament players. Even in a tournament of 1 million players you only need to capture information about the nine other players at your table, so there is no excuse for failing to do so. Start off with general observations like loose or aggressive and become more specific as you are given more information. Gathering information about a poker player is an ongoing process so always start with the very first hand and go from there.

There are plenty of common mistakes made in poker tournaments, but stay patient and alert and observe opponents from the first hand and you will do well if the poker luck goes your way. Remember if you bust out with bad play you do not get a chance to get lucky.

By Malcolm Clarke

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 8.0/10 (2 votes cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Tags: , , , , ,


Dec 19 2009

Playing Heads up Against Aggressive Stealers

Category: Poker Blogcarl @ 12:31 pm

In ring games whether they are full-ring or six max, there will always be a fair number of players who will raise with a fairly wide range from the button. Most of the time a wider opening range will be correct anyway but some players stray away from this in many poker games and start open raising with around 75% of their total range!

This may even be correct of course at the lower stakes games where more players are playing tightly and especially if they are getting rakeback. If you have been active in a game and have been folding several big blinds then whoever is on the button may just think that it is open season on your blind.

One such hand that I played last year should highlight the point. It was folded to the button who open raised to $3.50 in a NL100 Holdem poker game and we both had $100+ stacks. I had the Kc-3c and called. Many players would either three bet or fold here and these are not bad lines to take.

My own preference is not to escalate a pot out of position with a weak hand and to try and see more streets against a player who I rate to be better than. I want to outplay him and not try to outmuscle him. Trying to outmuscle someone who is prepared for a fight may not be a very wise online poker strategy and I have the capability to play well beyond the flop.

The flop came Ah-Ks-2d giving me middle pair and weak kicker. My opponent had been very aggressive and my Poker Office told me that this guy raised a lot of buttons when it had been folded to him. So my middle pair is now ahead of his range so I wait for the obvious continuation bet and check-call.

If I am behind then so be it and your variance increases in and around the blinds but you shouldn’t be afraid of that as good solid short handed skills can make you a mint in small-stakes poker. My opponent was raising 73% of his hands when folded to on the button so my K-3s favours well against his range.

Against players who play badly post flop and who think that aggression is the be all and end all of poker then you can really find good EV in these situations. The turn card is the 3h giving me two pair and the probable best hand. With $17.50 in the pot then I need to decide what to do. If I check then they may check a lot of hands back as I have called a pre-flop raise and also a flop bet on a board with no draws.

I decide to check and let him possibly fire another barrel as a bluff and I do so but this plan is foiled by them checking behind me. The river card is the 9d and now it is time to value bet or to encourage a bluff. His betting sequence looks weak so I make what looks like a weak stab and bet $10 and he raises to $35 and I call and take the pot.

Carl “The Dean” Sampson

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 8.0/10 (2 votes cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Tags: , , , ,


Next Page »